YuraZhum

Anarchism: Its Philosophy and Ideal (1896)
Контексте: We know well the means by which this association of the lord, priest, merchant, judge, soldier, and king founded its domination. It was by the annihilation of all free unions: of village communities, guilds, trades unions, fraternities, and mediæval cities. It was by confiscating the land of the communes and the riches of the guilds; it was by the absolute and ferocious prohibition of all kinds of free agreement between men; it was by massacre, the wheel, the gibbet, the sword, and the fire that Church and State established their domination, and that they succeeded henceforth to reign over an incoherent agglomeration of subjects, who had no direct union more among themselves.
It is now hardly thirty or forty years ago that we began to reconquer, by struggle, by revolt, the first steps of the right of association, that was freely practised by the artisans and the tillers of the soil through the whole of the middle ages.
And, already now, Europe is covered by thousands of voluntary associations for study and teaching, for industry, commerce, science, art, literature, exploitation, resistance to exploitation, amusement, serious work, gratification and self-denial, for all that makes up the life of an active and thinking being. We see these societies rising in all nooks and corners of all domains: political, economic, artistic, intellectual. Some are as shortlived as roses, some hold their own since several decades, and all strive — while maintaining the independence of each group, circle, branch, or section — to federate, to unite, across frontiers as well as among each nation; to cover all the life of civilized men with a net, meshes of which are intersected and interwoven.

„Природа полна таких примеров, причем в каждом классе животных на высшей ступени развития стоят именно общительные виды. Взаимная помощь внутри вида будет, таким образом …, главным фактором, главным деятелем того, что можно назвать прогрессивным развитием.“

Петр Алексеевич Кропоткин (1842–1921) русский революционер, теоретик анархизма, географ, геоморфолог, историк, литератор

„Капиталистическое производство не может быть в интересах всех. Его цель — отнюдь не обеспечение благосостояния для всех. Оно ведется наудачу — ради барышей, а вовсе не ради общественных нужд.“

„Нет понятия утопия, есть нежелание двигаться к прогрессу.“

„Взаимопомощь – фактор эволюции.“