Майкл Крайтон цитаты

Майкл Крайтон фото
0  0

Майкл Крайтон

Дата рождения: 23. Октябрь 1942
Дата смерти: 4. Ноябрь 2008
Другие имена:Мајкл Крајтон

Реклама

Майкл Крайтон — американский писатель-фантаст, сценарист и кинорежиссёр, продюсер, широко известный благодаря своим произведениям в жанрах научной фантастики, медицинской фантастики и триллера. Его книги проданы по всему миру тиражом более 150 млн экземпляров, многие были экранизированы. В 1994 году был единственным человеком, чьи произведения были одновременно номером один на телевидении , в киноискусстве и в книгоиздательской отрасли .

Его литературные произведения обычно являются сочетанием жанров боевика и технотриллера, описывая катастрофы — результат человеческих ошибок при обращении с новейшими технологиями, в особенности с биотехнологиями. Действие многих книг происходит в медицинском или научном мире, отражая прошлое самого автора.

Среди прочего, является автором следующих книг: «Штамм „Андромеда“», «Конго», «Сфера», «Восходящее солнце», «Затерянный мир», «Крылья», «Стрела времени», «Рой», «Next» , «Пиратские широты».

Подобные авторы

Айзек Азимов фото
Айзек Азимов23
американский писатель-фантаст, популяризатор науки, биохимик
Джордж Мартин фото
Джордж Мартин17
американский писатель-фантаст, сценарист, продюсер и реда...
Стивен Кинг фото
Стивен Кинг46
американский писатель
Александр Грин фото
Александр Грин4
российский и советский писатель и поэт

Цитаты Майкл Крайтон

Реклама

„The romantic view of the natural world as a blissful Eden is only held by people who have no actual experience of nature.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: The romantic view of the natural world as a blissful Eden is only held by people who have no actual experience of nature. People who live in nature are not romantic about it at all. They may hold spiritual beliefs about the world around them, they may have a sense of the unity of nature or the aliveness of all things, but they still kill the animals and uproot the plants in order to eat, to live. If they don't, they will die.

„Most of us have had some experience interacting with religious fundamentalists, and we understand that one of the problems with fundamentalists is that they have no perspective on themselves. They never recognize that their way of thinking is just one of many other possible ways of thinking, which may be equally useful or good.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: Most of us have had some experience interacting with religious fundamentalists, and we understand that one of the problems with fundamentalists is that they have no perspective on themselves. They never recognize that their way of thinking is just one of many other possible ways of thinking, which may be equally useful or good. On the contrary, they believe their way is the right way, everyone else is wrong; they are in the business of salvation, and they want to help you to see things the right way. They want to help you be saved. They are totally rigid and totally uninterested in opposing points of view. In our modern complex world, fundamentalism is dangerous because of its rigidity and its imperviousness to other ideas.

„This is politicking, not predicting.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: I want to mention in passing that punditry has undergone a subtle change over the years. In the old days, commentators such as Eric Sevareid spent most of their time putting events in a context, giving a point of view about what had already happened. Telling what they thought was important or irrelevant in the events that had already taken place. This is of course a legitimate function of expertise in every area of human knowledge. But over the years the punditic thrust has shifted away from discussing what has happened, to discussing what may happen. And here the pundits have no benefit of expertise at all. Worse, they may, like the Sunday politicians, attempt to advance one or another agenda by predicting its imminent arrival or demise. This is politicking, not predicting. [https://web.archive.org/web/20050328084634/http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/speeches_quote03.html "Why Speculate?"] - speech at the International Leadership Forum, La Jolla, California (26 April 2002)

„Science is the most exciting and sustained enterprise of discovery in the history of our species. It is the great adventure of our time.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: Science is the most exciting and sustained enterprise of discovery in the history of our species. It is the great adventure of our time. We live today in an era of discovery that far outshadows the discoveries of the New World five hundred years ago. "Ritual Abuse, Hot Air, and Missed Opportunities: Science Views Media" Speech to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Anaheim, California (25 January 1999)

Реклама

„I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely re-emerges in another form. You can not believe in God, but you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: I studied anthropology in college, and one of the things I learned was that certain human social structures always reappear. They can't be eliminated from society. One of those structures is religion. Today it is said we live in a secular society in which many people — the best people, the most enlightened people — do not believe in any religion. But I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely re-emerges in another form. You can not believe in God, but you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.

„Environmentalism needs to be absolutely based in objective and verifiable science, it needs to be rational, and it needs to be flexible. And it needs to be apolitical. To mix environmental concerns with the frantic fantasies that people have about one political party or another is to miss the cold truth — that there is very little difference between the parties, except a difference in pandering rhetoric.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: Environmentalism needs to be absolutely based in objective and verifiable science, it needs to be rational, and it needs to be flexible. And it needs to be apolitical. To mix environmental concerns with the frantic fantasies that people have about one political party or another is to miss the cold truth — that there is very little difference between the parties, except a difference in pandering rhetoric. The effort to promote effective legislation for the environment is not helped by thinking that the Democrats will save us and the Republicans won't. Political history is more complicated than that.

„Science is nothing more than a method of inquiry. The method says an assertion is valid — and merits universal acceptance — only if it can be independently verified.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: Science is nothing more than a method of inquiry. The method says an assertion is valid — and merits universal acceptance — only if it can be independently verified. The impersonal rigor of the method means it is utterly apolitical. A truth in science is verifiable whether you are black or white, male or female, old or young. It's verifiable whether you like the results of a study, or you don't. Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (28 September 2005)

„I want to mention in passing that punditry has undergone a subtle change over the years.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: I want to mention in passing that punditry has undergone a subtle change over the years. In the old days, commentators such as Eric Sevareid spent most of their time putting events in a context, giving a point of view about what had already happened. Telling what they thought was important or irrelevant in the events that had already taken place. This is of course a legitimate function of expertise in every area of human knowledge. But over the years the punditic thrust has shifted away from discussing what has happened, to discussing what may happen. And here the pundits have no benefit of expertise at all. Worse, they may, like the Sunday politicians, attempt to advance one or another agenda by predicting its imminent arrival or demise. This is politicking, not predicting. [https://web.archive.org/web/20050328084634/http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/speeches_quote03.html "Why Speculate?"] - speech at the International Leadership Forum, La Jolla, California (26 April 2002)

Реклама

„The notion that the natural world obeys its own rules and doesn't give a damn about your expectations comes as a massive shock... it will demand that you adapt to it — and if you don't, you die.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: The notion that the natural world obeys its own rules and doesn't give a damn about your expectations comes as a massive shock... it will demand that you adapt to it — and if you don't, you die. It is a harsh, powerful, and unforgiving world, that most urban westerners have never experienced.

„I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely emerges in another form. Even if you don't believe in God, you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.

„Even if you don't believe in God, you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: I think that you cannot eliminate religion from the psyche of mankind. If you suppress it in one form, it merely emerges in another form. Even if you don't believe in God, you still have to believe in something that gives meaning to your life, and shapes your sense of the world. Such a belief is religious.

„Those who are certain are demonstrating their personality type, or their belief system, not the state of their knowledge.“

— Michael Crichton
Context: The second reason to abandon environmental religion is more pressing. Religions think they know it all, but the unhappy truth of the environment is that we are dealing with incredibly complex, evolving systems, and we usually are not certain how best to proceed. Those who are certain are demonstrating their personality type, or their belief system, not the state of their knowledge.

Далее
Годовщины сегодня
Аль Капоне фото
Аль Капоне22
американский гангстер 1899 - 1947
Роберт Фишер фото
Роберт Фишер42
американский шахматист, одиннадцатый чемпион мира 1943 - 2008
Другие 69 годовщин
Подобные авторы
Айзек Азимов фото
Айзек Азимов23
американский писатель-фантаст, популяризатор науки, биохимик
Джордж Мартин фото
Джордж Мартин17
американский писатель-фантаст, сценарист, продюсер и реда...
Стивен Кинг фото
Стивен Кинг46
американский писатель