Жак Лакан цитаты

Жак Лакан фото
1   4

Жак Лакан

Дата рождения: 13. Апрель 1901
Дата смерти: 9. Сентябрь 1981

Реклама

Жак Мари́ Эми́ль Лака́н — французский психоаналитик, философ и психиатр. Одна из самых влиятельных фигур в истории психоанализа.

Подобные авторы

Эрнест Ренан фото
Эрнест Ренан26
французский писатель, историк и филолог
Симона Вейль фото
Симона Вейль17
французский философ и религиозный мыслитель
Клод Адриан Гельвеций фото
Клод Адриан Гельвеций71
французский литератор и философ-материалист
Люк де Клапье Вовенарг фото
Люк де Клапье Вовенарг98
французский философ, моралист и писатель
Симона де Бовуар фото
Симона де Бовуар37
французская писательница, философ, идеолог феминистского ...
Мишель де Монтень фото
Мишель де Монтень231
французский писатель и философ

Цитаты Жак Лакан

Реклама

„What concerns us is the that envelops these messages, the network in which, on occasion, something is caught. Perhaps the voice of the gods makes itself heard, but it is a long time since men lent their ears to them in their original state—it is well known that the ears are made not to hear with.“

—  Jacques Lacan
Context: By, the subject, where it was, where it has always been, the dream. The ancients recognized all kinds of things in dreams, including, on occasion, messages from the gods—and why not? The ancients made something of these messages from the gods. And, anyway—perhaps you will glimpse this in what I shall say later—who knows, the gods may still speak through dreams. Personally, I don't mind either way. What concerns us is the that envelops these messages, the network in which, on occasion, something is caught. Perhaps the voice of the gods makes itself heard, but it is a long time since men lent their ears to them in their original state—it is well known that the ears are made not to hear with. Of the Network of Signifiers

„In order to understand the Freudian concepts, one must set out on the basis that it is the subject who is called—the subject of Cartesian origin. This basis gives its true function to what, in analysis, is called recollection or remembering. Recollection is not Platonic reminiscence —it is not the return of a form, an imprint, a eidos of beauty and good,a supreme truth, coming to us from the beyond. It is something that comes to us from the structural necessities, something humble, born at the level of the lowest encounters and of all the talking crowd that precedes us, at the level of the structure of the signifier, of the languages spoken in a stuttering, stumbling way, but which cannot elude constraints whose echoes, model, style can be found, curiously enough, in contemporary mathematics.“

—  Jacques Lacan
Context: It is on this step that depends the fact that one can call upon the subject to re-enter himself in the unconscious—for, after all, it is important to know who one is calling. It is not the soul, either mortal or immortal, which has been with us for so long, nor some shade, some double, some phantom, nor even some supposed psycho-spherical shell, the locus of the defences and other such simplified notions. It is the subject who is called— there is only he, therefore, who can be chosen. There may be, as in the parable, many called and few chosen, but there will certainly not be any others except those who are called. In order to understand the Freudian concepts, one must set out on the basis that it is the subject who is called—the subject of Cartesian origin. This basis gives its true function to what, in analysis, is called recollection or remembering. Recollection is not Platonic reminiscence —it is not the return of a form, an imprint, a eidos of beauty and good, a supreme truth, coming to us from the beyond. It is something that comes to us from the structural necessities, something humble, born at the level of the lowest encounters and of all the talking crowd that precedes us, at the level of the structure of the signifier, of the languages spoken in a stuttering, stumbling way, but which cannot elude constraints whose echoes, model, style can be found, curiously enough, in contemporary mathematics. Of the Network of Signifiers

„The real is what resists symbolization absolutely.“

—  Jacques Lacan, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique

Реклама
Реклама
Далее
Сегодня годовщина
Джордж Оруэлл фото
Джордж Оруэлл74
английский писатель и публицист 1903 - 1950
Антонио Гауди фото
Антонио Гауди7
испанский и итальянский архитектор 1852 - 1926
Майкл Джексон фото
Майкл Джексон62
американский артист, актёр, автор и исполнитель песен 1958 - 2009
Жак-Ив Кусто фото
Жак-Ив Кусто25
Французский океанограф, популяризатор науки, один из созд... 1910 - 1997
Другие 52 годовщин
Подобные авторы
Эрнест Ренан фото
Эрнест Ренан26
французский писатель, историк и филолог
Симона Вейль фото
Симона Вейль17
французский философ и религиозный мыслитель
Клод Адриан Гельвеций фото
Клод Адриан Гельвеций71
французский литератор и философ-материалист