Жак Деррида цитаты
страница 2

Жак Деррида́ — французский философ и теоретик литературы, создатель концепции деконструкции. Один из самых влиятельных философов конца XX века, Деррида часто игнорируется в англо-американской традиции аналитической философии :201.

Основная цель Деррида — борьба с европейской философской традицией:661 с помощью созданного им проекта деконструкции. Для Деррида такая борьба имеет позитивный смысл и позволяет обновить понимание места человека в мире. Деррида постоянно подвергался критике по самым разным вопросам: от упрёков в излишней педантичности при анализе текстов до обвинений в обскурантизме. Философ старался отвечать своим многочисленным оппонентам – от Серля до Фуко и Хабермаса.

В своих работах Деррида затрагивал широкий круг вопросов — от онтологических и эпистемологических проблем философской традиции до проблем языка, литературы, эстетики, психоанализа, религии, политики и этики:138.

В поздний период Деррида сосредоточился на этико-политической проблематике.



Wikipedia  

✵ 15. Июль 1930 – 9. Октябрь 2004
Жак Деррида фото
Жак Деррида: 69   цитат 24   Нравится

Жак Деррида знаменитые цитаты

„Наших монстров нельзя продемонстрировать. Вы не можете сказать - вот монстры моего сознания, потому что тогда они сразу превращаются в домашних животных.“

Some Statements and Truisms about Neologisms, Newisms, Postisms, Parasitisms, and other small Seismisms, The States of Theory, ed. David Carroll, New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.
Monsters cannot be announced. One cannot say: 'here are our monsters', without immediately turning the monsters into pets

Жак Деррида цитаты

Эта цитата ждет обзора.
Эта цитата ждет обзора.
Эта цитата ждет обзора.

Жак Деррида: Цитаты на английском языке

“The disciple must break the glass, or better the mirror, the reflection, his infinite speculation on the master. And start to speak.”

Jacques Derrida книга Writing and Difference

Cogito and The History of Madness, p.37 (Routledge classics edition)
Writing and Difference (1978)

“Amy Kofman: Have you read all the books in here?
Derrida: No, only four of them. But I read those very, very carefully.”

Jacques Derrida книга Specters of Marx

Derrida (2003 documentary), referring to his personal library
Specters of Marx (1993), 2000s

“In order to try to remove what we are going to say from what risks happening, if we judge by the many signs, to Marx's work today, which is to say also to his injunction. What risks happening is that one will try to play Marx off against Marxism so as to neutralize, or at any rate muffle the political imperative in the untroubled exegesis of a classified work. One can sense a coming fashion or stylishness in this regard in the culture and more precisely in the university. And what is there to worry about here? Why fear what may also become a cushioning operation? This recent stereotype would be destined, whether one wishes it or not, to depoliticize profoundly the Marxist reference, to do its best, by putting on a tolerant face, to neutralize a potential force, first of all by enervating a corpus, by silencing in it the revolt [the return is acceptable provided that the revolt, which initially inspired uprising, indignation, insurrection, revolutionary momentum, does not come back]. People would be ready to accept the return of Marx or the return to Marx, on the condition that a silence is maintained about Marx's injunction not just to decipher but to act and to make the deciphering [the interpretation] into a transformation that "changes the world. In the name of an old concept of reading, such an ongoing neutralization would attempt to conjure away a danger: now that Marx is dead, and especially now that Marxism seems to be in rapid decomposition, some people seem to say, we are going to be able to concern ourselves with Marx without being bothered-by the Marxists and, why not, by Marx himself, that is, by a ghost that goes on speaking. We'll treat him calmly, objectively, without bias: according to the academic rules, in the University, in the library, in colloquia! We'll do it systematically, by respecting the norms of hermeneutical, philological, philosophical exegesis. If one listens closely, one already hears whispered: "Marx, you see, was despite everything a philosopher like any other; what is more [and one can say this now that so many Marxists have fallen silent], he was a great-philosopher who deserves to figure on the list of those works we assign for study and from which he has been banned for too long.29 He doesn't belong to the communists, to the Marxists, to the parties-, he ought to figure within our great canon of Western political philosophy. Return to Marx, let's finally read him as a great philosopher."”

Jacques Derrida книга Specters of Marx

We have heard this and we will hear it again.
Injunctions of Marx
Specters of Marx (1993)

“Although Saussure recognized the necessity of putting the phonic substance between brackets ("What is essential in language, we shall see, is foreign to the phonic character of the linguistic sign" [p. 21]. "In its essence it [the linguistic signifier] is not at all phonic" [p. 164]), Saussure, for essential, and essentially metaphysical, reasons had to privilege speech, everything that links the sign to phone. He also speaks of the "natural link" between thought and voice, meaning and sound (p. 46). He even speaks of "thought-sound" (p. 156). I have attempted elsewhere to show what is traditional in such a gesture, and to what necessities it submits. In any event, it winds up contradicting the most interesting critical motive of the Course, making of linguistics the regulatory model, the "pattern" for a general semiology of which it was to be, by all rights and theoretically, only a part. The theme of the arbitrary, thus, is turned away from its most fruitful paths (formalization) toward a hierarchizing teleology:… One finds exactly the same gesture and the same concepts in Hegel. The contradiction between these two moments of the Course is also marked by Saussure's recognizing elsewhere that "it is not spoken language that is natural to man, but the faculty of constituting a language, that is, a system of distinct signs …," that is, the possibility of the code and of articulation, independent of any substance, for example, phonic substance.”

Jacques Derrida книга Positions

Источник: Positions, 1982, p. 21

“I am one of those marranes who no longer say they are Jews even in the secret of their own hearts.”

"Circumfession." In Jacques Derrida, eds. G. Bennington & J. Derrida, trans. G. Bennington. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, p. 170

“No one can deny the suffering, fear, or panic, the terror or fright that can seize certain animals and that we humans can witness. … No doubt either, then, of there being within us the possibility of giving vent to a surge of compassion, even if it is then misunderstood, repressed, or denied, held at bay. … The two centuries I have been referring to somewhat casually in order to situate the present in terms of this tradition have been those of an unequal struggle, a war (whose inequality could one day be reversed) being waged between, on the one hand, those who violate not only animal life but even and also this sentiment of compassion, and, on the other hand, those who appeal for an irrefutable testimony to this pity. War is waged over the matter of pity. This war is probably ageless but, and here is my hypothesis, it is passing through a critical phase. We are passing through that phase, and it passes through us. To think the war we find ourselves waging is not only a duty, a responsibility, an obligation, it is also a necessity, a constraint that, like it or not, directly or indirectly, no one can escape. Henceforth more than ever. And I say “to think” this war, because I believe it concerns what we call “thinking.””

Jacques Derrida книга The Animal That Therefore I Am

The animal looks at us, and we are naked before it. Thinking perhaps begins there.
Specters of Marx (1993), The Animal That Therefore I Am, 1997

“The end of man (as a factual anthropological limit) is announced to thought from the vantage of the end of man (as a determined opening or the infinity of a telos). Man is that which is in relation to his end, in the fundamentally equivocal sense of the word. Since always.”

"The Ends of Man," Margins of Philosophy, tr. w/ notes by Alan Bass. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 1982. (original French published in Paris, 1972, as Marges de la philosophie). p. 123

“Circumcision, that’s all I’ve ever talked about.”

"Circumfession." In Jacques Derrida, eds. G. Bennington & J. Derrida, trans. G. Bennington. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, p. 70

Подобные авторы

Анри Бергсон фото
Анри Бергсон 24
французский философ
Поль Валери фото
Поль Валери 54
французский поэт, эссеист, философ
Мишель Фуко фото
Мишель Фуко 30
французский философ
Жан-Поль Сартр фото
Жан-Поль Сартр 70
французский философ, писатель, драматург, педагог
Ханна Арендт фото
Ханна Арендт 9
немецко-американский философ еврейского происхождения, поли…
Вальтер Беньямин фото
Вальтер Беньямин 9
немецкий философ, теоретик истории, эстетик, историк фотогр…
Альбер Камю фото
Альбер Камю 142
французский писатель-экзистенционалист
Симона Вейль фото
Симона Вейль 18
французский философ и религиозный мыслитель
Мартин Бубер фото
Мартин Бубер 4
еврейский философ
Андре Жид фото
Андре Жид 23
французский писатель