Александр Александрович Богданов цитаты

Алекса́ндр Алекса́ндрович Богда́нов — российский учёный-энциклопедист, революционный деятель, врач, мыслитель-утопист, писатель-фантаст, один из крупнейших идеологов социализма. Член РСДРП в 1896—1909, большевик, с 1905 член ЦК. Организатор группы «Вперёд» и партийных школ РСДРП на Капри и в Болонье. В 1911 г. отошёл от активной политической деятельности и сосредоточился на разработке своих идей о новых науках — тектологии, и «науки об общественном сознании»; предвосхитил некоторые положения системного подхода и кибернетики. В 1918—1920 — идеолог Пролеткульта. С 1926 года — организатор и директор первого в мире Института переливания крови; погиб, производя на себе опыт. Wikipedia  

✵ 10. Август 1873 – 7. Апрель 1928
Александр Александрович Богданов фото
Александр Александрович Богданов: 12   цитат 0   Нравится

Александр Александрович Богданов: Цитаты на английском языке

“Tektology must clarify the modes of organization that are perceived to exist in nature and human activity; then it must generalize and systematize these modes; further, it must explain them, that is, propose abstract schemes of their tendencies and laws; finally, based on these schemes, determine the direction of organizational methods and their role in the universal process. This general plan is similar to the plan of any natural science; but the objectives of tektology are basically different. Tektology deals with organizational experiences not of this or that specialized field, but of all these fields together. In other words, tektology embraces the subject matter of all other sciences, and of all human experience giving rise to these sciences, but only from the aspect of method: that is, it is interested only in the mode of organization of this subject matter.”

Вариант: Tektology must clarify the modes of organization that are perceived to exist in nature and human activity; then it must generalize and systematize these modes; further it must explain them, that is, propose abstract schemes of their tendencies and laws; finally, based on these schemes, determine the direction of organizational methods and their role in the universal process. This general plan is similar to the plan of any natural science; but the objective of tektology is basically different. Tektology deals with organizational experiences not of this or that specialized field, but of all these fields together. In other words, tektology embraces the subject matter of all the other sciences and of all the human experience giving rise to these sciences, but only from the aspect of method, that is, it is interested only in the modes of organization of this subject matter.
Источник: Essays in tektology, 1980, p. iii

“The strength of an organization lies in precise coordination of its parts, in strict correspondence of various mutually connected functions. This coordination is maintained through constant growth in tektological variety, but not without bounds:... there comes a moment when the parts of the whole become too differentiated in their organization and their resistance to the surrounding environment weakens. This leads sooner or later to disorganization.”

Источник: Tektology. The Universal Organizational Science, 1922, p. 248, as cited in: George Gorelik, " Reemergence of Bogdanov's Tektology in Soviet Studies of Organization http://monoskop.org/images/0/00/Gorelik_George_1975_Reemergence_of_Bogdanovs_Tektology_in_Soviet_Studies_of_Organization.pdf." Academy of Management Journal 18.2 (1975): 345-357.

“In the struggle of mankind with the elements, its aim is dominion over nature. Dominion is a relationship of the organizer to the organized. Step by step, mankind acquires control over and conquers nature; this means that step by step it organizes the universe; it organizes the universe for Itself and in its own interests. Such is the meaning and content of the age-long labour of mankind.
Nature resists elementally and blindly with the terrible strength of its dark, chaotic, but innumerable and Infinite army of elements. In order to conquer it, mankind must organize itself into a mighty army. Unconsciously, it has been doing this for centuries by forming working collective, ranging from the small primitive communes of the primordial epoch to the contemporary cooperation of hundreds of millions of people.
If mankind had to organize the universe only with the forces and means given to it by nature, it would not have any advantage over the other living creatures which also fight for survival against the rest of nature. In its labour mankind uses tools, which it takes from the same external nature. This forms the basis of its victories; it is this which long ago provided and continues to provide mankind with a growing superiority over the strongest and most terrible giants of elemental life and which distinguishes it from the rest of nature's kingdom.”

Источник: Essays in tektology, 1980, p. 1-2.

Подобные авторы

Мария Монтессори фото
Мария Монтессори 8
итальянский врач, педагог, учёный, философ, гуманистка
Альберт Швейцер фото
Альберт Швейцер 48
немецкий теолог, философ, музыкант и врач
Фридрих фон Хайек фото
Фридрих фон Хайек 21
австрийский экономист и философ
Януш Корчак фото
Януш Корчак 25
польский педагог, писатель, врач и общественный деятель
Макс Вебер фото
Макс Вебер 29
немецкий социолог, философ, историк, политический экономист
Роза Люксембург фото
Роза Люксембург 5
теоретик марксизма, философ, экономист и публицист
Феликс Эдмундович Дзержинский фото
Феликс Эдмундович Дзержинский 29
революционер, советский партийный деятель
Александр Исаевич Солженицын фото
Александр Исаевич Солженицын 42
русский писатель, публицист, поэт, общественный и политичес…
Людвиг фон Мизес фото
Людвиг фон Мизес 38
австрийский и американский экономист, историк, философ
Питер Друкер фото
Питер Друкер 25
американский экономист австрийского происхождения